Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplants and the Treatment
of Adult Leukemia
By
Amy Phillips
Research in Allied Health
Dr. Masini
Fall 2005
Abstract
Stem cell research is on the rise in order to
develop new treatments for diseases and injuries. Cord blood (blood left over
from the umbilical cord) is rich with stem cells. Researchers are discovering
new ways to use cord blood in the treatment of adults with leukemia. Leukemia
is a cancer of the blood-forming tissues of the body (1). Research shows that
by obtaining two units of cord blood and combining them, there are enough stem cells to successfully treat adult leukemia
(2). Of the research I found, the most successful form of treatment is a bone
marrow transplant from a matched donor. However, cord blood transplants using
two units had almost the same results of those receiving bone marrow transplants from imperfectly matched donors. For most considering cord blood transplants, it is an absolute last resort (3). Success rates are higher with matched bone marrow transplants. However,
any type of treatment is better than no treatment and cord blood transplants give hope to adults battling this deadly cancer.
Introduction
Stem cell research is a very controversial topic
in the United States as well as in the world. Stem
cells are “master cells” that can generate different types of cells within the body (4). The focus of this research is cord blood. Cord blood is the
blood left over in the umbilical cord at the time of birth. This blood is rich
with stem cells that can be used in the treatment of many diseases including Leukemia and sickle-cell anemia (4). Studies have even shown that the body’s immune system originates from cord blood and can treat other
diseases, not just immune or blood disorders (5). There is clinical evidence
that these stem cells can generate into brain, liver, heart, and bone cells. Much
of the controversy regarding this topic has to deal with the ethical and moral dilemma.
Some stem cell research comes from the cloning or copying of embryos for the purpose of medical experimentation. However, not all stem cell research is dependent on cloning. The purpose of this research is to educate others about the process of cord blood stem cell transplantation
and its benefits. I will be focusing on cord blood as a treatment for adult leukemia.
Problem Statement
Cord blood has been used successfully in the
treatment of leukemia in children. However, this treatment has not been a recommended
choice for adults. This is because it is difficult to obtain a dose large enough
to successfully treat adults (cord blood contains about 1/10 the number of useable stem cells as bone marrow) (3). Researchers are now trying to solve this problem by combining two cord blood units from different donors
for the stem cell transplant. Is this promising treatment, once limited to children,
now open to all patients, including adults? Does it show similar results in children
as well as adults? I intend to answer these questions and give valid research
findings in order to inform others about the recent findings in this extremely promising treatment.
Review of Literature
Leukemia is a cancer of the blood-forming tissue
(1). An example of this tissue is bone marrow.
Bone marrow produces three types of blood cells. These cells are red blood
cells, white blood cells, and platelets. All blood cells begin as stem cells
in the bone marrow. Stem cells are immature cells that can develop into any type
of cell in the body. They are often referred to as “master cells.” When needed, the body signals these stem cells within the bone marrow to mature into
any of the three types of blood cells (1). In patients with leukemia, these blood
cells are abnormal and cannot function properly.
There are several options for the treatment of
leukemia. One treatment is a stem cell transplant. This is possible through a bone marrow transplant from a healthy adult or from the cord blood of a newborn
(6). While cord blood transplants have been used successfully in the treatment
of a child with leukemia, it has not been recommended for the use of an adult with leukemia.
However, researchers are finding that cord blood is now a feasible option for the treatment of adult leukemia. Researchers from the University
of Minnesota began combining cord blood from two different donors in
order to obtain a sufficient amount of stem cells. Their study was published
in the issue of Blood, the official journal for the American Society of Hematology.
In this study, twenty-three patients were studied for a period of over two years.
For each patient, a match could not be made possible from an adult volunteer.
Cord blood, on the other hand, is more tolerant of differences between the donor and patient because the stem cells
are so immature. Dr. John Wagner, Scientific Director of Clinical Research of
the UM Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program and Stem Cell Institute, concluded that these patients could still have successful
transplants from two partially-matched units of cord blood. Unfortunately, two
patients died shortly have the transplant due to infection. However, for the
remaining twenty one patients, the transplanted stem cells began to produce normal, healthy cells. After one year, fifty-seven percent of the patients were disease free.
The success rate rose to seventy-two percent for those who received the transplant while their cancer was in remission
(7).
There are several advantages to cord blood transplants. First, there is no threat to the donor. It
is painless and non-invasive. Secondly, once cord blood is collected, it is frozen
and stored in a cord blood bank ready for use. This means that it can take less
time for a patient to receive a transplant. With bone marrow transplants, a search
must be made from national and international databases, which may take a substantial amount of time (7).
Even though there is plenty of promising research
about this treatment, I did find a study that compared three types of stem cell transplants in which cord blood transplants
weren’t necessarily the best treatment. Mary J. Laughlin, MD, associate
professor of medicine at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, conducted a study comparing 600 leukemia patients
who received either one of three transplants. These transplants included bone
marrow from a matched (but unrelated) donor, a bone marrow transplant from an imperfectly matched (and unrelated) donor, or
a cord blood transplant. This study was to compare the success rate between the
different available transplants. Patients who received the matched marrow had
the best results. Three years after treatment, thirty-three percent of them were
still disease-free. However, there were few differences between the patients
who received unmatched marrow and those who received a cord blood transplant. After
three years, about twenty-two percent in each group were disease-free. However,
this study revealed a concerning figure. Those who received cord blood transplants
were at a higher risk for infections than those who received a bone marrow transplant (3).
This is because the stem cells in cord blood are much less developed than those from the bone marrow from a healthy
adult. As a result, it takes more time for the levels of blood platelets and
white blood cells to return to a normal level leaving the patient susceptible to deadly infections. In Laughlin’s study, infection as a cause of death in the first 100 days following transplant was
higher in the cord blood group (45% of deaths) than either of the bone marrow groups (21% for matched marrow and 24% for mismatched
marrow)(3).
Even though there are few differences in the
long term results of cord blood transplants and bone marrow transplants, the short term results can be deadly due to infection. As a result, after a cord blood transplant, patients are now being given growth factors
in order to stimulate the production of white blood cells and platelets (3). Now
that patients are given these growth factors, it takes less time for cord blood recipients to develop an immune system able
to fight infections.
When deciding which type of transplant is right
for a patient, it is important to consider the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).
An advantage of a cord blood transplant is the cord blood has a relatively low number of immune T-cells (2, 10). T-cells are white blood cells and are one of the most powerful cells of a person’s
immune system. If a donor and a recipient have too many differences, the T-cells
from the donor will attack the patient’s body because it is recognized as a “foreign body,” resulting in
GVHD. These cells play a key role in GVHD which can kill between twenty and forty
percent of the patients it affects. Since cord blood as a low number of T-cells,
the “threshold for a proper match between donor and patient is much lower than if cells were sourced from adult bone
marrow” (2).
There are two types of GVHD, acute and chronic. Acute GVHD occurs within the first three months and may cause irritation and allergies. Rashes may also cover the skin which can develop into blisters and can also affect
the stomach, liver, and intestines. Chronic GVHD occurs after three months following
transplantation. Not only does it carry the same side effects as acute GVHD,
but it also affects the salivary glands, mucous glands, and glands that lubricate the lining of the stomach and intestines
(8).
There have been studies conducted to compare
the rates of GVHD with bone marrow transplants and cord blood transplants. In
one particular study, researchers compared the records of 113 children who received cord blood transplants from siblings with
over records from over 2,000 children who received bone marrow transplants from siblings.
The rate of acute GVHD in children with cord blood transplants was fourteen percent while those receiving bone marrow
transplants rose to twenty-four percent. Of the children who lived more than
90 days after the transplant, only six percent developed chronic GVHD while fifteen percent of bone marrow recipients developed
chronic GVHD (9). Unfortunately, I could not find a study comparing the rates
of GVHD in adults receiving either a bone marrow transplant or cord blood transplant.
In one article, I found a particularly interesting
fact. With transplants containing two different units of cord blood, both units
will begin to produce healthy, functioning blood cells over the first few months. However,
one unit will become dominate and actually take over the other. There is no way of predicting which unit will become
dominate. It has been determined that there are no extra complications of using
two units of cord blood over one unit (2).
I wanted to compare the results of cord blood
transplants in children and adults with leukemia. However, I never found a study
that actually compared the two. Even though I did find separate studies and information
about the success of this treatment in both children and adults, I am hesitant to compare these results in this research paper
due to the different circumstances for each study. I do not want to present misleading
statistics and information. Since I cannot verify that each study was done in
the exact way, I will not compare them.
Methods
The purpose of my study is to compare the different
types of stem cell transplants available to adults suffering from leukemia. This
study is nonexperimental research and would be referred to as ex post facto research.
This is because the independent variable (leukemia) has already happened. I would submit my study to the university
IRB and comply with all HIPPA guidelines regarding patient confidentiality. I
am replicating a study I found during my research headed by Mary J. Laughlin and published in the New England Journal of Medicine (Vol. 351, No. 22:2265-2275). There
will be three groups: those receiving a matched bone marrow transplant, those receiving an imperfectly matched bone marrow
transplant, and those receiving a cord blood transplant containing two units of cord blood.
In my study, there will be no control group. Not only would it be unethical
to withhold treatment to leukemia patients, but it also is irrelevant to the purpose of this study dealing with the different
forms of transplants. This is considered a correlational study because there
is more than one variable. After the transplant, patients will be followed for
a minimum of three years. Infection, disease-free survival, relapse, and transplant-related
deaths will be measured separately in all three groups. This is considered to
be nominal date and the statistical findings are classified as nonparametric. In
order to ensure validity of my study, I will carefully pick my subjects and try to prevent historical contamination. In the original study, the researchers believed the two units of cord blood would
be an effective treatment, but did not know how it would hold up against bone marrow transplants. In my results, I hope to have the same findings as the original study.
The chances of survival were similar between the cord blood recipients (approximately 22%) and the mismatched bone
marrow recipients (approximately 22%). Those receiving matched bone marrow had
the highest survival rate of 33% after three years. However, infection as a cause
of death in the first 100 days following the transplant was significantly higher in cord blood recipients (approximately 45%
of deaths) than either of the bone marrow groups (21% for matched bone marrow and 24% for unmatched bone marrow)(3). If my study resulted in similar findings this would increase the reliability of the
original study which concerns with the replicability of scientific findings.
Conclusion
All of the studies I found recognized cord blood
transplants as a successful treatment for adult leukemia. Even though one unit
of cord blood does not contain enough stem cells to treat an adult, studies show combining two units offers a chance of survival. Even though matched bone marrow is the most successful, many patients cannot find
a match. For every ten patients needing a bone marrow transplant, only two will
find a bone marrow match (2). With that in mind, studies show that cord blood
transplants may be more beneficial than mismatched bone marrow transplants due to the decreased risk of GVHD even though both
have similar success rates. This provides many adults suffering from leukemia
with treatment options that might give them another chance at life.
References
American Cancer
Society (2004). Cord Blood Transplants
Help Adults with Leukemia.
Retrieved November 6, 2005 from World Wide Web:
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/content/NWS_1_1x_Cord_Blood_Transplants_Hel p_Adults_with_leukemia.asp .(3)
Barclay, Laurie
(2001). High-Risk Procedure pays off for
Leukemia Patient. Retrieved November. 6, 2005 from World
Wide Web: http://aolsvc.webmd.aol.com/content/article/33/1738_81494.htm. (5)
Chao, Nelson J. (2004). Stem Cell Transplantation (Cord Blood Transplants). Retrieved on November 10, 2005 from World Wide Web: http://www.asheducationbook.org/cgi/content/full/2004/1/354. (10)
Griffin, R. Morgan (2005). Cord Blood Stem Cells: Your Questions Answered. Retrieved November 5, 2005 from World Wide Web: http://aolsvc.health.webmd.aol.com/content/article/109/109262.htm?printing=true. (4)
Leukemia Patients Treated with Cord Blood Face Lower Risk of Complications. (2000). Retrieved November 21, 2005 from University of Minnesota Cancer Center Website: http://www.cancer.umn.edu/page/news/GVHDstudy.html. (9)
McFarland, Helen
M. (n.d.). Oncology: Thalidomide, Stem-Cell Transplantation, and Leukemia Updates. Retrieved on November 14, 2005 from MedScape Database:
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/418739. (8)
Mundell, E.J. (2005). New Approach Works Against Leukemia, Lymphoma.
Retrieved November 10, 2005 from World Wide Web: http://ww.hon.ch/News/HSN/526565.html.
(2)
Stark, Laura.
(2005). Cord Blood Transplantation Now a Viable Option for Adult Leukemia Patients. Retrieved
on November 21, 2005 from World Wide Web:
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/printerfriendlynews.php?newsid=19066. (7)
Warner, Jennifer.
(2004). Cord Blood Transplants Realistic Option for Adult Leukemia Treatment. Retrieved on November 10, 2005 from World Wide Web: http://aolsvc.health.wedmd.aol.com/content/article/97/104256.htm. (6)
What is Leukemia? (2005) Retrieved on November 6, 2005 from World Wide Web:
http://www.mdanderson.org/departments/leukemia/print.cfm?dIndexPrint=1&pn=A8426.
(1)